The ambulance stretcher innovation of asian cardiopulmonary resuscitation asia cpr pilot trial.
Manual chest compression machine.
Critical care med 2013 jul 41 7 1782 9.
Chest compression fraction between mechanical compressions on a reducible stretcher and manual compressions on a standard stretcher during transport in out of hospital cardiac arrests.
He was on the lucas machine for 2 hours and needed nine defibs over the two cardiac arrests to come back.
1 westfall m krantz s mullin c et al.
To assess the effectiveness of resuscitation strategies using mechanical chest compressions versus resuscitation strategies using standard manual chest compressions with respect to neurologically intact survival in patients who suffer cardiac arrest.
A common problem during manual cpr is that the chest does not always recoil because of an increase in chest wall compliance softens.
2 1 lucas chest compression system the lucas chest compression system is a portable tool designed to overcome problems identified with manual chest compressions.
Meet lucas 3 version 3 1 the latest lucas 3 v3 1 allows professional users to tailor setup options for compression rate depth pauses alerts timer and ventilation features to meet local emergency care protocols.
The lucas chest compression system is designed to deliver uninterrupted compressions at a consistent rate and depth to facilitate rosc return of spontaneous.
Although other cpr devices provide consistent compression depth and rate the lucas device because of its integrated suction cup is the only automated device that assists the decompression phase by drawing up on the chest and returning it to neutral.
Objective to compare resuscitation outcomes following out of hospital cardiac arrest when an automated ldb cpr device was added to standard emergency.
In the case of load distributing band cardiopulmonary resuscitation it was superior to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation as t.
Use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out of hospital cardiac arrest.
The lucas device assists rescuers by delivering effective consistent and continuous chest compressions as recommended in the american heart association guidelines1 and the european.
Mechanical chest compression devices have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation cpr.
Journal of the american medical association 295 22 2620.